After the war, in October 1947 when I (H. Pfeifer) came as a student to the University of Leipzig,
the famous institute of physics located near the outskirts in the Linnéstrasse 5 was only a ruin
(see Figure 2). The large auditory, the director's villa, the large store rooms of scientific apparatus and most laboratories were completely destroyed.
As a result, lectures were delivered at the institute of mathematics about one mile away where some rooms were also placed at the disposal of physicists
including the director's office and the library. Fortunately, nearly 80% of the scientific books and journals were saved since the physics library
was housed in the tower of the institute which survived the bombs due to its internal stability. In the ruin however, rain was destroying more and
more of the remaining laboratories and mechanical workshops and I remember that in spite of the fact that all electrical equipment had been switched off,
we observed a permanent electrical current of nearly 10 A at the main line supplying the ruin. Nevertheless it was an exciting time of renewal,
and at the end of the 1940s we received all the issues of Physical Review which could not be delivered before due to the war and after-war Problems.
About that time Artur Lösche had finished his thesis on birefringence induced by mechanical
rotation of polar liquids and became an assistant at the institute of physics. Being responsible for the library, he organized a systematic study of these journals. During this study
we became aware of the exciting experiments of the former Leipzig scientist Felix Bloch, and in the summer of 1950, A. Lösche suggested the search for
nuclear magnetic resonance signals including preliminary experiments as a suitable topic for a diploma thesis. At this time I was students' assistant
for the lectures in experimental physics delivered by the director of the institute, Professor Waldemar Ilberg,
a physicist who had changed after the war from the electronic industry (radar research) to university. He proposed the study of the light efficiency
of gas discharge lamps since this would be a problem of special importance for an industry which was beginning to start at this time from a very low level in Germany.
As a young student, it was not very easy for me to come to a decision but finally I chose the 'entirely useless' search for signals stemming from the Zeeman energy of hydrogen nuclei.
There were two further students, Lippmann and Weber, who also followed the suggestion of Dr. Lösche, so that we three started separately in September 1950
to find the nuclear induction signals which were described for the first time in 1946 independently by Felix Bloch et al. and E. M. Purcell et al. in the January issue of the Physical Review [3].
For my studies I used an old electromagnet that had survived the bombardments of the Institute
(December 4, 1943, February 19, 1944, and April 6, 1945) and with the direct current supply commonly available in Leipzig at this time it was possible
to achieve a magnetic field of about 0.8 T with a gap width of 2 cm. Stimulated by a paper by A. Roberts [4] I decided to build a superregenerative detector
(see Figure 3) and in this connection to study the nonlinear theory of electric oscillations established more than 20 years previously by van der Pol [5].
As a result of the latter studies it could be shown theoretically [6] why harmonic electric oscillations can be generated in the case of parallel
resonant circuits only through a combination with a device whose negative differential electric resistance is achieved from the positive values via
infinity, while for the other type of resonant circuits where the capacitor is in series with the inductance, the differential electric resistance
must be zero at the transition from plus to minus. These considerations, however, did not help as much as some hints that I received from A. Roberts
as a response to a letter that I wrote to him concerning practical aspects of the superregenerative detector. At the end of June 1951- I do not know the exact date,
but I remember that it was in the late evening - I was looking at an oscilloscope at the output of the detector and listening simultaneously to a loudspeaker parallel to it.
Suddenly I heard a growl when I varied the magnetic field around a certain value. Apparently it was caused by the 50 Hz modulation of the direct current of the electromagnet and,
as it should, the growl ceased immediately after removing the small glass tube containing a dilute aqueous solution of iron chloride from the magnet:
it was the first nuclear magnetic resonance signal at that place which Felix Bloch had left in 1933 and the first observed in Germany. Unfortunately,
when the director of the institute, who had heard of that experiment, came to the ruin at the Linnéstrasse 5 to see the NMR signal, I could not reproduce it.
I was very ashamed, but father-like and with a slight smile on his face he said, 'Oh. I do know this effect very well,
we called it several years ago the "Vorführeffekt" (demonstration effect)'. Of course a few days later I observed the NMR signal again and started
a systematic study that finally led to my diploma thesis [7]. In the following year the other two students also succeeded, and Dr. Lösche published
the first original paper on NMR in German with the title Kernparamagnetismus und Hochfrequenztechnik. In 1953 another review by A. Lösche was published [9]
and two original papers appeared in German about proton magnetic relaxation in liquids by Krüger from Stuttgart [10] and about the measurement of the intensity
of the Earth's magnetic field by NMR [11]. One amusing point is that in the latter paper the editor had changed the symbol Ø for the unit Oersted to the abbreviation
Dmr for diameter so that the author and the readers of the paper were surprised to find that the total intensity of the earth's magnetic field at Leipzig had been measured
by NMR to be 0.475 ± 0.078 'diameters'. In 1954 a short note by W. Müller-Warmuth from the University of Frankfurt/Main appeared about an electronic device of the bridging
type for measuring NMR signals [12]. The thesis Freie Präzessionen kernmagnetischer Momente by Günther Laukien [13] was submitted to the TH Stuttgart in 1955.
G. Laukien also wrote the contribution Kernmagnetische Hochfrequenzspektroskopie [14] for the "Handbuch der Physik" in 1957.
Since then, as in other countries, the number of NMR papers from Germany increased nearly exponentially and a complete survey can be found in the book
"Kerninduktion" which was published by A. Lösche [15] in 1957, being the third monograph on nuclear
magnetic resonance spectroscopy that appeared after the books of Andrew [16] and Grivet [17]. From March 31 to April 2, 1960 the
First German Conference on rf Spectroscopy was organized at Leipzig, and in 1961, only a few weeks after the wall was built in Berlin, the
Tenth Colloque AMPERE (after Paris 1952, Grenoble 1953, Paris 1954, Paris 1955, Geneva 1956, St. Malo 1957, Paris 1958, London 1959, Pisa 1960)
took place in Leipzig with A. Lösche as chairman of the organizing
committee.
References
[1] H. Pfeifer in Encyclopedia of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Vol. 1, Historical Perspectives, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, New York 1996; H. Pfeifer, Magn.
Reson. Chem. 1999, 37, 154
[2] F. Bloch,Physics Today, Dec. 1976, 29, 23.
[3] E. M. Purcell, H. C. Torrey, and R. V. Pound, Phys. Rev. 1946, 69, 37, F.Bloch, W. W. Hansen, and M. Packard, Phys. Rev. 1946, 69, 127
[4] A. Roberts, Rev.
Sci. Instrum. 1947, 18, 845
[5] B. van der Pol, Proc. Inst. Radio Eng. 1934, 22, 1051
[6] H. Pfeifer, Z. Angew. Physik, 1954, 6, 508
[7] H. Pfeifer,
diploma thesis, Universität Leipzig, 1951
[8] A. Lösche, Nachrichtentech. Elektron. 1952, 2, 144
[9] A. Lösche, Exp. Tech. Phys. 1953, 1, 19, 69, 128
[10] H. Krüger, Kolloid-Z.. 1953, 134, 93
[11] H. Pfeifer, Nachrichtentech. Elektron. 1953, 3, 371
[12] W. Müller-Warmuth, Naturwissenschaften 1954, 1, 368
[13] G. Laukien, PhD thesis, Stuttgart, 1955
[14] G. Laukien, in Handbuch der Physik, Vol. 38, 1
[15] A. Lösche, Kerninduktion, Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften, Berlin, 1957
[16] E. R. Andrew, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Cambridge University Press, 1955
[17] P. Grivet, La Résonance Paramagnétique Nucléaire, Paris, 1955